There's not a huge difference, except the price tag really. Some have maybe a 5% difference in speed but really nowadays there hasn't been any huge innovations for either company so it's pretty much a tie with the hardware part of it.Hi guys I'm looking to buy a new computer but I'm wondering what processor is better Intel or AMD For Gaming
But in my builds for my business (TechCyberster.com) I almost always use AMD because it's stable and usually $20-60 cheaper than it's Intel counterpart.There's not a huge difference, except the price tag really. Some have maybe a 5% difference in speed but really nowadays there hasn't been any huge innovations for either company so it's pretty much a tie with the hardware part of it.
I've never had an AMD get hot, stock fan or aftermarket fan. As for overclocking an Intel processor I have no idea to be honest, but I do know that most can't be over clocked right out of the box.Well there is pros and cons for both sides. AMD seems to run hotter. While most Intel aren't overclockable unless they are unlocked ones.
Well my AMD chip rn burns steadily hot. Even with an after market cooler on it. It'll stay at a constant 75C Under full load. That's 10C off of when this chip will just shut itself off to make sure it doesn't fry the chip.I've never had an AMD get hot, stock fan or aftermarket fan. As for overclocking an Intel processor I have no idea to be honest, but I do know that most can't be over clocked right out of the box.
Here you go... http://m.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.htmlHi guys I'm looking to buy a new computer but I'm wondering what processor is better Intel or AMD For Gaming
Yeah I have an a10 build as well with no video card at all and it actually runs most modern games. I was impressed with it too.I seem to think that while AMD usually has a higher clock speed than Intel CPUs, AMDs run slower at multi threaded applications. So if a program is designed to use all 4 cores of your processor, Intel will be better. But if you are running single threaded applications that only use 1 core, AMD is better. But that doesnt mean AMD makes bad CPUs. They are generally much cheaper and their FX series is excellent. Used an AMD A10 in my last build and it was a great CPU.
That's not good at all... but I've never experienced that with my use of AMD processors so I have no ides how to solve that issue, lol.Well my AMD chip rn burns steadily hot. Even with an after market cooler on it. It'll stay at a constant 75C Under full load. That's 10C off of when this chip will just shut itself off to make sure it doesn't fry the chip.
Well my AMD chip rn burns steadily hot. Even with an after market cooler on it. It'll stay at a constant 75C Under full load. That's 10C off of when this chip will just shut itself off to make sure it doesn't fry the chip.
This is backwards. Intel CPU's are better at both, especially In Single Threaded Applications where Intel processors excell by a much larger margin. AMD's processors compete better in Multithreaded workloads (Since they have more "Cores".), but still usually underperform compared to Intel. Also raw clock speed =/= Better. It's pointless to compare clock speeds between architectures, due to things like IpC and Lithography.I seem to think that while AMD usually has a higher clock speed than Intel CPUs, AMDs run slower at multi threaded applications. So if a program is designed to use all 4 cores of your processor, Intel will be better. But if you are running single threaded applications that only use 1 core, AMD is better. But that doesnt mean AMD makes bad CPUs. They are generally much cheaper and their FX series is excellent. Used an AMD A10 in my last build and it was a great CPU.